As someone who does, and has one of the worst case examples for all those issue (as in Reference Blower Model) I can tell you its over-hyped. Many of them *most infact* have not had first hand ownership of Vega. Dont let people who cry foul on heat/thermals/noise fool you. The Radeon VII/GTX-1080ti/RTX-2080 and the 2080ti are all better options at 4K, but might be out of your price bracket considering you plan to stick to a budget FX rig for your base.Ĭurrently Vega 64 will offer you best FPS/$$, you can often find new units in the $400 range. Since you *plan* to play at 4K, and since FX can push 60FPS (assuming you will run 4k/60) then you wont be hitting much of a bottle neck on the FX chip and *will* want the most GPU you can push for the buck, as the GPU will *still* be the weak point in 4K gaming.įor 4K I would *not* go below Vega 64 or GTX-1080 or RTX-2070, all of which are roughly the same in real world performances, give or take a few FPS here and there.
IS AN 8320 GOOD FOR 1080 VIDEO EDITING 1080P
Thank you everyone for you were going 1080p I would advise a mid range card because of bottlenecking that would occur.
Higher than 1080 but should not be pushing as hard as the 4k to keep a decent refresh rate? Trying to take in all this info is a alot. Would upgrading CPU to the fx-8370(8 core, 4ghz/4.3 turbo, 8 threads) be of any help or a different CPU? Motherboard supports AM3+Ģnd edit:ok what about 1440 resolution. I do realize I probably won't be able to max graphics but I would at least like "good" graphics/performance.Įdit: would like to go 4k resolution. Is the GPU sufficient for gaming for games like skyrim, planet coaster, and/or pubg? What graphics card would be sufficient or recommended or best value? AMD rx Vega 56? I don't have a monitor yet but was looking at one with free sync instead of gsync. The computer has 8gb ram but will have 16 or more after input more in. It does have a graphics card but I plan on replacing it. I am being given a computer with an fx-8320(8 core, 3.5GHz/4 GHz boost, 8 threads).
0 kommentar(er)
